Food Buffet Regulation Needed!

Let’s face it, when you go to a buffet you can over eat – as a matter of fact you’re encouraged to! Just take a look at this sign from a local buffet (one I just overate at) reminding you to “Keep eating, There’s WAY more where that came from“.  The waitress was no help, she was continually asking to take away our plates so we could get more. To top it off she kept refilling our dangerous fountain sodas (full of high-fructose corn syrup) so we wouldn’t have to get up and stop consuming! Totally irresponsible.

20120309-193102.jpg

 

Our federal, state, and maybe local governments need to take some action. Clearly people who eat here regularly, and follow this type of guidance, will become unhealthy. I noticed a very high number of overweight people compared to similar restaurants that aren’t “buffet style”. I’m sure there is some left-over stimulus money or federal grants available to do a study of the obvious here. It’s quite possible overeating leads to obesity and  we know obesity leads to many other illnesses. With cities banning all types of unhealthy fats, schools mandating what foods kids bring in their lunch sacks, and new regulations to force that local “Ma and Pa” deli’s to cough up nutritional menus I think this is a good fit for the a little “Nanny State” action!

Maybe I’m jumping the gun and we just need to raise awareness. I’m sure the media would love to do some serious investigative journalism here. Potentially we can get Morgan Spurlock, director and actor in “Super Size Me”, to consider a new film where he eats daily at a buffet until they stop taking his plate away? Well that might be too dangerous to Mr. Spurlock, he barely survived filming his last “documentary”.

Since the government provides or subsidizes healthcare for many Americans, and you pay for that with your taxes, it’s in our national interest to take action. I’ve got some decent ideas of how regulation of these dangerous buffets could improve the quality of American lives:

  • One Trip Only. It’s fine to give people buffet options, but when they can keep going back … they might, and that could lead to long-term health problems. No more plate-refills.
  • Photographic Warnings. With cigarettes the government required manufacturers to show pictures of the effects of a life of smoking. Taking a page from that playbook, maybe the end of the line should have life sized pictures of naked overweight people? It’s for the good of society.
  • Outlaw Buffets. Unfortunately, people will always think a buffet line means “eat all you want”. Weddings and parties both contain the same dangers. I mean think how hard it is for pastors to stay healthy doing all those wedding receptions with unlimited food!
  • Enforce Food Pyramid. Require all buffet’s to have foods representative of the Federal food pyramid (now a plate with no dessert). The buffet lines should be separated  by type and size in the pyramid.
  • Taxes. Taxes are a great way to reduce things WE don’t like and push things WE do. All restaurants with proper nutritional information and government-portion-compliant will get a 50% reduction in taxes they need to collect. All non-compliant restaurants will have to collect a 25% tax.

Clearly it’s the government’s role to take care of all of us and they need to take action today! I’m going to call my senators and congressman right away. On second thought, it’s possible they might take all this seriously and further erode the ability for citizens to make their own decisions – good or bad. If you like any of these stupid ideas then please keep voting for politicians who feel like their role is to “fix society” instead of protecting our freedoms.

Somebody should create a site about these nanny-state-isms …coming soon….

Ban All Email!

Thierry Breton, CEO of Atos (one of Europe’s largest information technology services companies), is going to ban his staff from sending each other emails. He said it’s a waste of time and outdated form of communication. Apparently he wants this new  “zero email” policy to be in place within as early as 18 months! He argues that only 10% of the 200 average emails his employees get each day turn out to be useful. Instead of email he’s pushing for instant messaging and Facebook style communications (status updates, notifications, etc).

Read full story online

Could your company survive without email? When I look at my email I see a lot of the following items:

  • Corporate news notifications
  • Nags to do things I haven’t done yet (from various systems)
  • FYI emails

What if we took all of our “notifications” and “nags” and plugged them into an employee Facebook-style “homepage” (along with some embedded experiences to handle the notification without leaving the homepage)? What if your travel approvals displayed on the homepage and when you hovered you saw the full request – and better yet you had the accept/reject links right there (handle without leaving the page). Might that be more efficient and make email more meaningful?

I think having a company sponsored no-email day to raise awareness of what email is useful for – and to experience how much more we might be able to get done would be very interesting! Wouldn’t you love starting the week with a no-email Monday? 🙂

Going 100% Digital – But what about the NOTEPAD?

I’ve been on a journey to migrate my “stuff” to digital – and most recently to the cloud. My last holdout was the trusted journal/notebook. I think I’ve turned the corner here and will share story from my new iPad notebook (forgive the handwriting, it’s never been my strength).

If you’ve been considering the same all I can say is, “TRY IT!”.

Google Web Elements

Yet another nifty thing for small websites from Google. Web Elements let you magically weave in content to your site with carefully crafted iframed widgets.

I’ve used the search/news widget on several sites and it works great! Anywhere you can embed some HTML you can use these widget.

Read More and Try it out

I’m Voting Against Puppies and for Guns in Schools

Not really.

I get an average of five election phone calls a day and over half a dozen letters in the mail (nice big color ones). Most all of them are negative, but I’ve learned a new trick to figure out what people are for based on the bashing. One fiscal conservative I plan to vote for is accused of wanting “guns in schools”. I’m guessing that means he supports our current state law, not that he wants tweens packing heat at the local middle school. The same guy is labeled as a puppy hater. A puppy hater? Well there is a big fight over a new law to stop puppy mills (I guess all the ones we have aren’t enough yet). Because of the two party system my options get pretty narrow after the primaries. I’m sure people in politics would tell me this is all part of the process of our democracy. Just like the founding fathers imagined it right? … well we aren’t supposed to talk about them anymore.

The way I see it the majority of people representing us are part of a political system we don’t really understand  and it’s broken. I’m biased, but I think we have the best form of government on the planet.  Maybe you look around the world with romantic notions about Venezuela, Iran, or Sweden but I don’t.  In some sense though I feel like our government is held hostage. I see a two-party system controlled by big companies, unions, and special interest groups. The people they control build huge election war chests and continue to “serve us” election after election. As our government has become more centralized and powerful so have the forces that seek to influence it. When I look at a number of our “representatives” I see a lot of millionaires, many that got that way while in office [hmmmm]. I see men and woman that started out trying to make a difference and became a part of a dysfunctional machine.  President Obama is an example of this. I don’t agree with his “progressive” philosophies but I do think he was interested in a more open, transparent government. He figured out quickly that the political machines didn’t see it his way. Before long his idealism was lost and he was operating just like the ones before him.

Tomorrow you probably have two imperfect choices.  One of them is likely to be a progressive. This person wants us to continue the path of growing the government and it’s role in our lives. Maybe it makes sense to have the Social Security Administration take and manage your 401k? Maybe all student loans should go through the government. Maybe the government should decide what light bulbs people should buy, what night they trick-or-treat, and what 3 types of healthcare insurance should be allowed for sale (but you must buy it).  Generally they support higher taxes to pay for their programs (nothing is free) and more deficit spending if required. Progressives want everything to be “fair” and generally equal for everyone. The other option you have is some sort of conservative. They might have a label like libertarian, tea-party, or neo-con. They are pretty pessimistic about the role of government and think we need to take a step back and have a smaller, leaner government. Some of them want very little government at all. Regardless of the size of our federal government, all of them want  it operate generally within its means (without new taxes). That sounds good, but most of them aren’t ready to make the needed cuts to achieve their goals. Their view is that everyone should have a fair and equal opportunities for success but everything isn’t going to be fair or equal in the end.

The options tomorrow might not all be great, but they are clear. We can keep moving toward the government as the centerpiece of our American existence or vote to take a step back.  If you think your government is doing a great job, vote for more of the same. If you think our government is growing out of control, vote for a change.

Comments closed, this is a soapbox entry.