Why I had Chick-Fil-A for Lunch

My LunchMostly I was hungry, and they have yummy chicken. I might have another reason though…

Let’s review some fast food politics.

  • Chick-fil-A gives money to non-profits that patronize their business which also support the Defense of Marriage Act. This act signed into law by Bill Clinton all but disallows same-sex marriage by making it not recognized by the federal government and allowing states to not honor other states same-sex marriage. A company leader recently stated that not having same-sex marriage was his personal religious belief.
  • Starbucks supports organizations that support changing marriage to include same-sex marriages. In addition the company officially supports this political agenda (not just an opinion of a business leader). Starbucks would be on the opposite political spectrum of Chick-Fil-A.

So we have two fast food companies on different sides of a single political issue. One is defending current law and the status-quo, one wants to change it.

When Starbucks made their public move to actively support changing policies on gay-marriage people announced they’d boycott Starbucks. Fair enough – people do that all the time. It’s a valid way to try and get companies with products you like to “see things your way”. Sometimes it actually works.

When a Chick-Fil-A leader made a public statement about his personal opinions on running his private business some people decided to boycott them, fair enough. Other than the company not having an official stance on the issue there are a lot of similarities to Starbucks – but there is a new twist to the Chick-Fil-A story.

Multiple government officials have stated they would discourage or disallow a private company to operate due to its political views. San Francisco stated, “The closest Chick-Fil-A to San Francisco is 40 miles away & I strongly recommend that they not try to come any closer”. The Boston mayor stated Chick-Fil-A wouldn’t get business licenses until they change their politics. Chicago Alderman Joe Moreno stated: “I will now be denying Chick-fil-A’s permit to open a restaurant in the 1st Ward.” Apparently these towns have plenty of jobs already and political issues are a litmus test for doing business.

My personal opinion is that no matter how ugly an elected official finds a company’s political views they shouldn’t penalize companies because of them. All businesses following the law should have equal rights to practice commerce. What’s ironic about this case is that the three Democrat mayors making comments about Chick-Fil-A not doing business in their town likely voted for Clinton (who signed the Defense of Marriage act) and Obama (who supported it as a candidate, but no longer does). One of the mayors, Rahm Emmanuel (Chicago), even served with a president that supported the policy. Apparently for some people who you get your fast-food lunch from is more important than who runs your nation.

Are you surprised how this energized the “right” to eat more chicken? If so, I’d suggest we get a few bone-headed conservative mayors to not allow Starbucks in their towns. The reaction would be amazing and I’d bet would even attract presidential comment. Whether you are right, left, or middle I hope you agree letting elected officials prevent or discourage companies from doing commerce solely based on their political party or political views is a bad idea. I think Supreme Court cases involving what’s known as the doctrine of “unconstitutional conditions” would likely disallow such ideological actions.

So, In support of not letting Fascist-like mayors dictate what politics companies and their leaders must have in order to do business maybe I’ll top off my Chick-Fil-A salad later with a Starbucks latte!

Food Buffet Regulation Needed!

Let’s face it, when you go to a buffet you can over eat – as a matter of fact you’re encouraged to! Just take a look at this sign from a local buffet (one I just overate at) reminding you to “Keep eating, There’s WAY more where that came from“.  The waitress was no help, she was continually asking to take away our plates so we could get more. To top it off she kept refilling our dangerous fountain sodas (full of high-fructose corn syrup) so we wouldn’t have to get up and stop consuming! Totally irresponsible.

20120309-193102.jpg

 

Our federal, state, and maybe local governments need to take some action. Clearly people who eat here regularly, and follow this type of guidance, will become unhealthy. I noticed a very high number of overweight people compared to similar restaurants that aren’t “buffet style”. I’m sure there is some left-over stimulus money or federal grants available to do a study of the obvious here. It’s quite possible overeating leads to obesity and  we know obesity leads to many other illnesses. With cities banning all types of unhealthy fats, schools mandating what foods kids bring in their lunch sacks, and new regulations to force that local “Ma and Pa” deli’s to cough up nutritional menus I think this is a good fit for the a little “Nanny State” action!

Maybe I’m jumping the gun and we just need to raise awareness. I’m sure the media would love to do some serious investigative journalism here. Potentially we can get Morgan Spurlock, director and actor in “Super Size Me”, to consider a new film where he eats daily at a buffet until they stop taking his plate away? Well that might be too dangerous to Mr. Spurlock, he barely survived filming his last “documentary”.

Since the government provides or subsidizes healthcare for many Americans, and you pay for that with your taxes, it’s in our national interest to take action. I’ve got some decent ideas of how regulation of these dangerous buffets could improve the quality of American lives:

  • One Trip Only. It’s fine to give people buffet options, but when they can keep going back … they might, and that could lead to long-term health problems. No more plate-refills.
  • Photographic Warnings. With cigarettes the government required manufacturers to show pictures of the effects of a life of smoking. Taking a page from that playbook, maybe the end of the line should have life sized pictures of naked overweight people? It’s for the good of society.
  • Outlaw Buffets. Unfortunately, people will always think a buffet line means “eat all you want”. Weddings and parties both contain the same dangers. I mean think how hard it is for pastors to stay healthy doing all those wedding receptions with unlimited food!
  • Enforce Food Pyramid. Require all buffet’s to have foods representative of the Federal food pyramid (now a plate with no dessert). The buffet lines should be separated  by type and size in the pyramid.
  • Taxes. Taxes are a great way to reduce things WE don’t like and push things WE do. All restaurants with proper nutritional information and government-portion-compliant will get a 50% reduction in taxes they need to collect. All non-compliant restaurants will have to collect a 25% tax.

Clearly it’s the government’s role to take care of all of us and they need to take action today! I’m going to call my senators and congressman right away. On second thought, it’s possible they might take all this seriously and further erode the ability for citizens to make their own decisions – good or bad. If you like any of these stupid ideas then please keep voting for politicians who feel like their role is to “fix society” instead of protecting our freedoms.

Somebody should create a site about these nanny-state-isms …coming soon….

Ban All Email!

Thierry Breton, CEO of Atos (one of Europe’s largest information technology services companies), is going to ban his staff from sending each other emails. He said it’s a waste of time and outdated form of communication. Apparently he wants this new  “zero email” policy to be in place within as early as 18 months! He argues that only 10% of the 200 average emails his employees get each day turn out to be useful. Instead of email he’s pushing for instant messaging and Facebook style communications (status updates, notifications, etc).

Read full story online

Could your company survive without email? When I look at my email I see a lot of the following items:

  • Corporate news notifications
  • Nags to do things I haven’t done yet (from various systems)
  • FYI emails

What if we took all of our “notifications” and “nags” and plugged them into an employee Facebook-style “homepage” (along with some embedded experiences to handle the notification without leaving the homepage)? What if your travel approvals displayed on the homepage and when you hovered you saw the full request – and better yet you had the accept/reject links right there (handle without leaving the page). Might that be more efficient and make email more meaningful?

I think having a company sponsored no-email day to raise awareness of what email is useful for – and to experience how much more we might be able to get done would be very interesting! Wouldn’t you love starting the week with a no-email Monday? 🙂

Going 100% Digital – But what about the NOTEPAD?

I’ve been on a journey to migrate my “stuff” to digital – and most recently to the cloud. My last holdout was the trusted journal/notebook. I think I’ve turned the corner here and will share story from my new iPad notebook (forgive the handwriting, it’s never been my strength).

If you’ve been considering the same all I can say is, “TRY IT!”.

Google Web Elements

Yet another nifty thing for small websites from Google. Web Elements let you magically weave in content to your site with carefully crafted iframed widgets.

I’ve used the search/news widget on several sites and it works great! Anywhere you can embed some HTML you can use these widget.

Read More and Try it out