<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Great Java &#187; wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatjava.org/tag/wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatjava.org</link>
	<description>Caffeinated Babblings!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Wave, email for the next generation?</title>
		<link>http://greatjava.org/2009/10/google-wave-email-for-the-next-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://greatjava.org/2009/10/google-wave-email-for-the-next-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Great Java</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatjava.org/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at Google decided to re-invent e-mail.  What would e-mail look like if we could &#8220;start over&#8221; and re-create it? You might think, &#8220;e-mail isn&#8217;t THAT old is it?&#8221; Actually it is. Internet e-mail and the specifications that define how it works have been around since 1982 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821). In the last twenty-seven years we&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" src="http://wave.google.com/help/wave/images/ss2.gif" alt="" width="244" height="340" />The folks at Google decided to re-invent e-mail.  What would e-mail look like if we could &#8220;start over&#8221; and re-create it? You might think, &#8220;e-mail isn&#8217;t THAT old is it?&#8221; Actually it is. Internet e-mail and the specifications that define how it works have been around since 1982 (<a style="color: #074d8f;" href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821" target="_blank">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821</a>). In the last twenty-seven years we&#8217;ve seen many fresh ideas about how to use technology to exchange information &#8211; Wikis, blogs, SMS, and IM are just a few.</p>
<p>Think about it. What if e-mail was more collaborative? What if an e-mail thread (the conversation) occured in a shared medium that could be updated realtime? What if, as you typed in information, others could watch your updates? Maybe we could combine e-mail conversations with the real-time aspect of instant messenger and throw in a little wiki-style editing for collaboration and history? How about having the ability to embed this conversation on a web page for a larger audience! That&#8217;s Google Wave &#8211; part document, part web, part conversation.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all become used to using a variety of communication tools that share a lot of similarities but aren&#8217;t integrated. Wave tries to merge communication and collaboration into a single interactive tool that you can easily extend and build upon.  In a large business we often use email and IM to communicate changes we are making on wikis and other collaborative sites.  I&#8217;m not sure Wave completely hits the mark for me but I love the idea of making email more like IM and placing collaborative tools in the space with the conversation.</p>
<p><strong>What I like:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Live update.  As you type, add pictures, or do anything the wave (the shared conversation) is updated realtime. I&#8217;d like a way to have it share only when I hit return, though!</li>
<li>Put a variety of content types in your Wave.  You can write your own plug-in and make it embeddable in a wave.</li>
<li>Very easy to create waves and add people to them.</li>
<li>Interesting protocols built on XMPP.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What I don&#8217;t like:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Not completely open source. Parts of it are, but you can&#8217;t download all the components and run it internally on your corporate intranet.</li>
<li>Too discussion-focused.  I&#8217;d like a &#8220;shelf&#8221; that I can put collaborative documents in the wave to draw attention to that as separate from the conversation.</li>
<li>UI is more &#8220;cool&#8221; than intuitive. I&#8217;m sure a lot of people will start with Wave and say, &#8220;huh?&#8221;.  Of course the answer is to watch the video demonstrations. Let&#8217;s just say it&#8217;s &#8220;google-ish&#8221;.</li>
<li>I&#8217;d like more structure to the wave (see shelf idea above).</li>
<li>Not available yet.  You have to be lucky enough to get an invite. <img src='http://greatjava.org/greatjava/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Anyway, that&#8217;s my half-baked opinion from a couple of days of use</strong></em>. If you haven&#8217;t seen Google wave you should <a href="http://wave.google.com/help/wave/about.html#video">watch the video</a>. It&#8217;s much easier to see it in action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greatjava.org/2009/10/google-wave-email-for-the-next-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
